lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180415143737.GN2341@sasha-vm> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 14:37:39 +0000 From: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com> To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com> CC: "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 168/189] nfsd: return RESOURCE not GARBAGE_ARGS on too many ops On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:27:47AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >What's your default on these patches on these AUTOSEL patches if you >don't get an ACK or NACK? Do you apply them anyway? Right now it's opt-out, so it'll get merged unless you NACK it. In general, these patches get higher visibility as a notice will be sent a few times for each of these, when: 1. I added it to my queue 2. When Greg sends his review cycle 3. Once a stable kernel is released >(I'd skip this one as it doesn't meet the "It must fix a real bug that >bothers people" criterion. But I don't recall it *causing* any bugs >either, so the stakes are low, I'm mainly just curious.) I'll drop it, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists