[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180415163101.6ab15cbc@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 16:31:01 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Hernán Gonzalez <hernan@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Cc: knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] staging: iio: ad7746: Add remove()
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:36:46 -0300
Hernán Gonzalez <hernan@...guardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
> This allows the driver to be probed and removed as a module powering it
> down on remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hernán Gonzalez <hernan@...guardiasur.com.ar>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7746.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7746.c b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7746.c
> index c29a221..05506bf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7746.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7746.c
> @@ -775,6 +775,31 @@ static int ad7746_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ad7746_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + struct ad7746_chip_info *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + unsigned char regval;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + regval = chip->config | AD7746_CONF_MODE_PWRDN;
> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(chip->client, AD7746_REG_CFG, regval);
As this is a one off operation, perhaps it would be better to factor
it out to a utility function then use devm_add_action_or_reset in
the probe?
Also, I am nervous about this change as there doesn't seem to be
path in probe by which this is deliberately reversed?
It seems to be 'accidentally' handled by the read_raw write to the
CFG register.
The data sheet doesn't really mention much about this register
at all. It may have special requirements to exit from power down - I have
no idea, but if it is costless, why do we bother with idle mode?
Perhaps Michael can confirm if this is safe to do or not.
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_warn(&client->dev, "Could NOT Power Down!\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
You can't safely do this against the devm_iio_device_register.
> +
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static const struct i2c_device_id ad7746_id[] = {
> { "ad7745", 7745 },
> { "ad7746", 7746 },
> @@ -799,6 +824,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver ad7746_driver = {
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ad7746_of_match),
> },
> .probe = ad7746_probe,
> + .remove = ad7746_remove,
> .id_table = ad7746_id,
> };
> module_i2c_driver(ad7746_driver);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists