[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452a9fc7-872d-05d4-289c-84ec58c0bee9@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:37:42 +0100
From: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com" <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] bindings: PCI: designware: Example update
Hi Rob,
On 13/04/2018 22:34, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:58:33PM +0100, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
>> Replaces "ctrlreg" reg-name by "dbi" to be coherent with similar drivers,
>> however it still be compatible with any previous DT that uses the old
>> reg-name.
>>
>> Replaces the PCIe base address example by a real PCIe base address in use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
>> ---
>> Changes v1->v2:
>> - Removed any iATU reference or changes to avoid confusion.
>> - Add "snps,dw-pcie" compatible string following Kishon's suggestion.
>> Changes v2->v3:
>> - Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt | 14 +++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
>> index 1da7ade..f02cd20 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
>> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
>> * Synopsys DesignWare PCIe interface
>>
>> Required properties:
>> -- compatible: should contain "snps,dw-pcie" to identify the core.
>> +- compatible:
>> + "snps,dw-pcie-rc", "snps,dw-pcie" for RC mode;
>
> I think adding this compatible is pointless. "snps,dw-pcie" meant RC and
> should continue to mean that. We also have compatibles with the IP
> version number as well as the SoC specific compatible strings. We don't
> need 4 compatible strings here.
Ok.
>
> Rob
>
Thanks,
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists