linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] IB: make INFINIBAND_ADDR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 01:56:20 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tarick Bedeir <tarick@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB: make INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS configurable

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:02:12AM +0000, Greg Thelen wrote:
> I think I've identified the set of options which use
> INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS without a kconfig depends:
> * CIFS_SMB_DIRECT
> * INFINIBAND_SRPT
> * NVME_RDMA
> * NVME_TARGET_RDMA
> 
> I have patches for the above, but need to finish the commit logs.  Let me
> know if they'll be nacked and I'll just patch my kernel and forget
> upstreaming.

I think those are what is needed.  But better do a full cycle through
the build bot first..

Btw, should we rename the config symbol to something containing
RDMACM?  The current name seems rather confusing?