[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1523871304-48517-1-git-send-email-michel.pollet@bp.renesas.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:34:55 +0100
From: Michel Pollet <michel.pollet@...renesas.com>
To: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: phil.edworthy@...esas.com, buserror+upstream@...il.com,
Michel Pollet <michel.pollet@...renesas.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...lessm.com>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 0/3] Renesas RZ/N1D SMP enabler
*Warning -- this requires the base RZ/N1 support patches already posted *
This is a tentative patch series for enabling the second CA7 of the RZ/N1D.
It's based on a spin_table method, and it reuses the same binding property
as that driver.
One question is: Do i have to document it separately, or is it sufficiently
clear?
Michel Pollet (3):
dt-bindings: cpu: Add Renesas RZ/N1D SMP enable method.
ARM: dts: Renesas RZ/N1D SMP enable method
arm: shmobile: Add the RZ/N1D SMP enabler driver.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi | 2 +
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/smp-r9a06g032.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/smp-r9a06g032.c
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists