[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09325238-a050-951a-a5ee-ffcb19813e3e@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:47:50 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] thermal: exynos: Read soc_type from match data
On 16/04/2018 14:41, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday, April 16, 2018 02:19:30 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 16/04/2018 12:11, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>> From: Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
>>>
>>> Device context's field data->soc is currently obtained by comparing
>>> of_compatible's. Provide soc_type as .data field in device's match
>>> table, as it is done in most drivers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>
> Zhang & Eduardo are Thermal Maintainers (+ I'm Maintainer for
> Samsung Thermal) so I assume you meant "Reviewed-by:"?
I meant Acked-by :) I don't have to be a subsystem maintainer to ack a
patch. The reviewed-by has a stronger statement than the acked-by.
The patch looks good to me.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists