linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/14] thermal: exynos: remove separate exynos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4780353.WGAykbfPTG@amdc3058>
Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:24:50 +0200
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] thermal: exynos: remove separate exynos_tmu.h
 header file

On Monday, April 16, 2018 03:24:57 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 16/04/2018 12:12, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > exynos_tmu.h is used only by exynos_tmu.c so there is no need
> > for a separate include file.
> > 
> > There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 41 ------------------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > index 7975f33..197f267 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@
> >  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> > +
> 
> This one should go away, no ?

Yes, thanks for noticing (I've just sent v2 of this patch).
.
> Apart this.
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics