[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180416.110501.92472500114183248.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:05:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: liu.xiang6@....com.cn
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
liuxiang_1999@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: davicom: dm9000: Avoid spinlock recursion
during dm9000_timeout routine
From: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang6@....com.cn>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 16:50:34 +0800
> +static bool dm9000_current_in_timeout(struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + ret = (db->timeout_cpu == smp_processor_id());
> + preempt_enable();
This doesn't work.
As soon as you do preempt_enable(), smp_processor_id() can change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists