linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.18 12/23] cpu_opv: Provide cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180416170240.mymd2kqfimydkhos@two.firstfloor.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:02:41 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
        Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
        rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.18 12/23] cpu_opv: Provide cpu_opv system call
 (v7)

> Single-stepping is only a subset of the rseq limitations addressed
> by cpu_opv. Anoher major limitation is algorithms requiring data
> migration between per-cpu data structures safely against CPU hotplug,
> and without having to change the cpu affinity mask. This is the case

And how many people are going to implement such a complex separate
path just for CPU hotplug? And even if they implement it how long
before it bitrots? Seems more like a checkbox item than a realistic
approach.

> for memory allocators and userspace task schedulers which require
> cpu_opv for migration between per-cpu memory pools and scheduler
> runqueues.

Not sure about that. Is that common?

> 
> About the vgettimeofday and general handling of vDSO by gdb, gdb's
> approach only takes care of line-by-line single-stepping by hiding
> Linux' vdso mapping so users cannot target source code lines within
> that shared object. However, it breaks instruction-level single-stepping.
> I reported this issue to you back in Nov. 2017:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/20/803

It was known from day 1, but afaik never a problem.

-Andi