linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drivers: soc: Add LLCC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2ca31c0ffd699d0aea13d09a3b2be0a8@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 22:50:10 +0530
From:   saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org
To:     Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        tsoni@...eaurora.org, kyan@...eaurora.org, ckadabi@...eaurora.org,
        stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm@...ts.infradead.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drivers: soc: Add LLCC driver

Hi Rishabh,

> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI sdm845 LLCC driver");

I think it should be QCOM or Qualcomm and not QTI

> +
> +	desc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct llcc_slice_desc), GFP_KERNEL);

Can use *desc instead

> +struct llcc_slice_desc *llcc_slice_getd(struct device *dev, const char 
> *name)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	int index = 0;
> +	const char *slice_name;
> +	struct property *prop;
> +
> +	if (!np)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);

Is this check required?

> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
> b/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3e97569
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Should be within /* */ for headers as per kernel licensing rules.

Regards,
Sai Prakash