lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 22:50:10 +0530
From:   saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org
To:     Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        tsoni@...eaurora.org, kyan@...eaurora.org, ckadabi@...eaurora.org,
        stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm@...ts.infradead.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drivers: soc: Add LLCC driver

Hi Rishabh,

> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI sdm845 LLCC driver");

I think it should be QCOM or Qualcomm and not QTI

> +
> +	desc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct llcc_slice_desc), GFP_KERNEL);

Can use *desc instead

> +struct llcc_slice_desc *llcc_slice_getd(struct device *dev, const char 
> *name)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	int index = 0;
> +	const char *slice_name;
> +	struct property *prop;
> +
> +	if (!np)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);

Is this check required?

> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
> b/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3e97569
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Should be within /* */ for headers as per kernel licensing rules.

Regards,
Sai Prakash

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ