[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180416143538.40a40457@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:35:38 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] docs/vm: convert to ReST format
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 20:36:56 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I didn't mean we should keep it as unorganized jumble of stuff and I agree
> that splitting the documentation by audience is better because developers
> are already know how to find it :)
>
> I just thought that putting the doc into the place should not be done
> immediately after mechanical ReST conversion but rather after improving the
> contents.
OK, this is fine. I'll go ahead and apply the set, but then I'll be
watching to see that the other improvements come :)
In applying the set, there was a significant set of conflicts with
vm/hmm.rst; hopefully I've sorted those out properly.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists