[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5af35710-b521-e22e-055b-798cbe343dc6@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:47:42 -0700
From: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Odelu Kukatla <okukatla@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add QCOM RPMh clock driver
Hello Taniya,
On 04/16/2018 10:38 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-13 19:36:41)
>> Add the RPMh clock driver to control the RPMh managed clock resources on
>> some of the Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>
>
> Your signoff chain is very confused. The first signoff should match the
> "From:" header but that doesn't seem to be the case here. And the sender
> should be the last in the chain.
It looks like the provenance of this driver go muddled during downstream
propagation between branches. The original downstream version of the
clk-rpmh driver was written by Osvaldo Banuelos [1]. I think that the
best course of action here would be to remove my Signed-off-by, add
Osvaldo's, and add yours.
Thanks,
David
[1]:
https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-4.9/commit/?id=11d3623c37afb945ce36755501812a44efeb6cd9
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists