[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3a9452b1-c22c-6a0a-b7b9-b77c3b98f6cb@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:37:09 +1000
From: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
To: "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@....ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
mikey@...ling.org, vaibhav@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, malat@...ian.org,
felix@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pombredanne@...b.com,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
fbarrat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, corbet@....net,
"Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@...ilva.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] ocxl: Rename pnv_ocxl_spa_remove_pe to clarify it's
action
On 17/04/18 12:09, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
>
> The function removes the process element from NPU cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
Hmm, personally I'd suggest pnv_ocxl_spa_clear_cache() because it's just
a wrapper around the OPAL call of a similar name.
But I don't feel strongly about this at all, so:
Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
Powered by blists - more mailing lists