[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180417085020.GA7214@mai>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:50:20 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: timer-sp: Use of_clk_get_parent_count()
instead of open coding
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:51:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> This depends on "[PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Extract OF clock helpers in
> <linux/of_clk.h>".
>
> v2:
> - of_clk_get_parent_count() was moved to <linux/of_clk.h>,
> - Dropped RFC, as a dummy is now available in the !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
> case.
> ---
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists