[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c951129-b167-3ed6-48f4-0a42cd2df28e@metafoo.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:45:20 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
vinod.koul@...el.com
Cc: eric.long@...eadtrum.com, broonie@...nel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] dmaengine: sprd: Add 'device_config' and
'device_prep_slave_sg' interfaces
On 04/10/2018 09:46 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
[...]
> +static int sprd_dma_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
> + struct dma_slave_config *config)
> +{
> + struct sprd_dma_chn *schan = to_sprd_dma_chan(chan);
> + struct sprd_dma_config *slave_cfg =
> + container_of(config, struct sprd_dma_config, config);
> +
Please do not overload standard API with custom semantics. This makes the
driver incompatible to the API and negates the whole idea of having a common
API. E.g. this will crash when somebody passes a normal dma_slave_config
struct to this function.
> + memcpy(&schan->slave_cfg, slave_cfg, sizeof(*slave_cfg));
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists