[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxix615i5pVFURtfAH3OmgiYuy37WD7hM8tA=69OCv9B1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:48:35 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Guillaume Morin <guillaume@...infr.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.parissis@...il.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"jack@...e.com" <jack@...e.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mszeredi@...hat.com" <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: kernel panics with 4.14.X versions
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:10:35PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
>> > From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>> > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 07:41
>> > ...
>> > How easily can you hit this? Are you able to run debug kernels / inspect
>> > crash dumps when the issue occurs? Also testing with the latest mainline
>> > kernel (4.16) would be welcome whether this isn't just an issue with the
>> > backport of fsnotify fixes from Miklos.
>>
>> It's not easy for us to reproduce the fsnotify() lockup issue, and actually
>> we still don't have an easy & reliable way to reproduce it.
>>
>> According to our tests, v4.16 doesn't have the issue.
>> And v4.15 doesn't have the issue either, if I recall correctly.
>> I only know the issue happens to v4.14.x and 4.13.x kernels
>
> Any chance to run 'git bisect' between 4.14 and 4.15 to find the fix?
>
Looking at the changes between 4.14 and 4.15, that are not in 4.14.32,
the only viable suspects are:
9cf90cef362d fsnotify: Protect bail out path of fsnotify_add_mark_locked()
properly
3427ce715541 fsnotify: clean up fsnotify()
Both don't claim to fix a known issue.
Both look like they could be applied cleanly to 4.14.y.
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists