[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1523975611-15978-7-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:33:12 +0200
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com, dave@...olabs.net,
jack@...e.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
kemi.wang@...el.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
npiggin@...il.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 06/25] mm: make pte_unmap_same compatible with SPF
pte_unmap_same() is making the assumption that the page table are still
around because the mmap_sem is held.
This is no more the case when running a speculative page fault and
additional check must be made to ensure that the final page table are still
there.
This is now done by calling pte_spinlock() to check for the VMA's
consistency while locking for the page tables.
This is requiring passing a vm_fault structure to pte_unmap_same() which is
containing all the needed parameters.
As pte_spinlock() may fail in the case of a speculative page fault, if the
VMA has been touched in our back, pte_unmap_same() should now return 3
cases :
1. pte are the same (0)
2. pte are different (VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME)
3. a VMA's changes has been detected (VM_FAULT_RETRY)
The case 2 is handled by the introduction of a new VM_FAULT flag named
VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME which is then trapped in cow_user_page().
If VM_FAULT_RETRY is returned, it is passed up to the callers to retry the
page fault while holding the mmap_sem.
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
mm/memory.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 4d1aff80669c..714da99d77a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1208,6 +1208,7 @@ static inline void clear_page_pfmemalloc(struct page *page)
#define VM_FAULT_NEEDDSYNC 0x2000 /* ->fault did not modify page tables
* and needs fsync() to complete (for
* synchronous page faults in DAX) */
+#define VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME 0x4000 /* Page table entries have changed */
#define VM_FAULT_ERROR (VM_FAULT_OOM | VM_FAULT_SIGBUS | VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV | \
VM_FAULT_HWPOISON | VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE | \
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 0b9a51f80e0e..f86efcb8e268 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2309,21 +2309,29 @@ static inline bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
* parts, do_swap_page must check under lock before unmapping the pte and
* proceeding (but do_wp_page is only called after already making such a check;
* and do_anonymous_page can safely check later on).
+ *
+ * pte_unmap_same() returns:
+ * 0 if the PTE are the same
+ * VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME if the PTE are different
+ * VM_FAULT_RETRY if the VMA has changed in our back during
+ * a speculative page fault handling.
*/
-static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
- pte_t *page_table, pte_t orig_pte)
+static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
- int same = 1;
+ int ret = 0;
+
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
if (sizeof(pte_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) {
- spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
- spin_lock(ptl);
- same = pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte);
- spin_unlock(ptl);
+ if (pte_spinlock(vmf)) {
+ if (!pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))
+ ret = VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME;
+ spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
+ } else
+ ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
}
#endif
- pte_unmap(page_table);
- return same;
+ pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
+ return ret;
}
static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
@@ -2912,10 +2920,19 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
pte_t pte;
int locked;
int exclusive = 0;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
- if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))
+ ret = pte_unmap_same(vmf);
+ if (ret) {
+ /*
+ * If pte != orig_pte, this means another thread did the
+ * swap operation in our back.
+ * So nothing else to do.
+ */
+ if (ret == VM_FAULT_PTNOTSAME)
+ ret = 0;
goto out;
+ }
entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry))) {
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists