lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180417004918.29213-3-longli@linuxonhyperv.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:49:15 -0700 From: Long Li <longli@...uxonhyperv.com> To: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Cc: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com> Subject: [PATCH 3/6] cifs: smbd: Avoid allocating iov on the stack From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com> It's not necessary to allocate another iov when going through the buffers in smbd_send() through RDMA send. Remove it to reduce stack size. Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com> --- fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c index b5c6c0d..f575e9a 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c @@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ int smbd_send(struct smbd_connection *info, struct smb_rqst *rqst) int start, i, j; int max_iov_size = info->max_send_size - sizeof(struct smbd_data_transfer); - struct kvec iov[SMBDIRECT_MAX_SGE]; + struct kvec *iov; int rc; info->smbd_send_pending++; @@ -2099,32 +2099,20 @@ int smbd_send(struct smbd_connection *info, struct smb_rqst *rqst) } /* - * This usually means a configuration error - * We use RDMA read/write for packet size > rdma_readwrite_threshold - * as long as it's properly configured we should never get into this - * situation - */ - if (rqst->rq_nvec + rqst->rq_npages > SMBDIRECT_MAX_SGE) { - log_write(ERR, "maximum send segment %x exceeding %x\n", - rqst->rq_nvec + rqst->rq_npages, SMBDIRECT_MAX_SGE); - rc = -EINVAL; - goto done; - } - - /* - * Remove the RFC1002 length defined in MS-SMB2 section 2.1 - * It is used only for TCP transport + * Skip the RFC1002 length defined in MS-SMB2 section 2.1 + * It is used only for TCP transport in the iov[0] * In future we may want to add a transport layer under protocol * layer so this will only be issued to TCP transport */ - iov[0].iov_base = (char *)rqst->rq_iov[0].iov_base + 4; - iov[0].iov_len = rqst->rq_iov[0].iov_len - 4; - buflen += iov[0].iov_len; + + if (rqst->rq_iov[0].iov_len != 4) { + log_write(ERR, "expected the pdu length in 1st iov, but got 0x%lu\n", rqst->rq_iov[0].iov_len); + return -EINVAL; + } + iov = &rqst->rq_iov[1]; /* total up iov array first */ - for (i = 1; i < rqst->rq_nvec; i++) { - iov[i].iov_base = rqst->rq_iov[i].iov_base; - iov[i].iov_len = rqst->rq_iov[i].iov_len; + for (i = 0; i < rqst->rq_nvec-1; i++) { buflen += iov[i].iov_len; } @@ -2197,14 +2185,14 @@ int smbd_send(struct smbd_connection *info, struct smb_rqst *rqst) goto done; } i++; - if (i == rqst->rq_nvec) + if (i == rqst->rq_nvec-1) break; } start = i; buflen = 0; } else { i++; - if (i == rqst->rq_nvec) { + if (i == rqst->rq_nvec-1) { /* send out all remaining vecs */ remaining_data_length -= buflen; log_write(INFO, -- 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists