[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180417155725.533672126@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:59:16 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.15 51/53] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Treat Interrupt ACPI resources as always being active-low
4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
commit bb5208b314c5127b716b2ee4f55803a8bb73b750 upstream.
Older devices with a serdev attached bcm bt hci, use an Interrupt ACPI
resource to describe the IRQ (rather then a GpioInt resource).
These device seem to all claim the IRQ is active-high and seem to all need
a DMI quirk to treat it as active-low. Instead simply always assume that
Interrupt resource specified IRQs are always active-low.
This fixes the bt device not being able to wake the host from runtime-
suspend on the: Asus T100TAM, Asus T200TA, Lenovo Yoga2 and the Toshiba
Encore, without the need to add 4 new DMI quirks for these models.
This also allows us to remove 2 DMI quirks for the Asus T100TA and Asus
T100CHI series. Likely the 2 remaining quirks can also be removed but I
could not find a DSDT of these devices to verify this.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198953
Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554835
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 20 +++-----------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
@@ -701,22 +701,6 @@ static const struct acpi_gpio_mapping ac
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
/* IRQ polarity of some chipsets are not defined correctly in ACPI table. */
static const struct dmi_system_id bcm_active_low_irq_dmi_table[] = {
- {
- .ident = "Asus T100TA",
- .matches = {
- DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR,
- "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."),
- DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "T100TA"),
- },
- },
- {
- .ident = "Asus T100CHI",
- .matches = {
- DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR,
- "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."),
- DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "T100CHI"),
- },
- },
{ /* Handle ThinkPad 8 tablets with BCM2E55 chipset ACPI ID */
.ident = "Lenovo ThinkPad 8",
.matches = {
@@ -744,7 +728,9 @@ static int bcm_resource(struct acpi_reso
switch (ares->type) {
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
irq = &ares->data.extended_irq;
- dev->irq_active_low = irq->polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
+ if (irq->polarity != ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW)
+ dev_info(dev->dev, "ACPI Interrupt resource is active-high, this is usually wrong, treating the IRQ as active-low\n");
+ dev->irq_active_low = true;
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GPIO:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists