lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGb2v67VL70yqTF7xq4T3_9zA9T3UT2AV0gGarh1mqvC17r3Mg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:12:41 +0800 From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> To: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Simon <horms@...ge.net.au>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, "open list:ARM/SHMOBILE ARM..." <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>, Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] ARM: sunxi: smp: Move assembly code into a file On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:50 AM, Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com> wrote: > Move the assembly code for cluster cache enabling and resuming > into an assembly file instead of having it directly in C code. > > Remove the CFLAGS because we are using the ARM directive "arch" > instead. > > Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile | 4 +-- > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 82 +++---------------------------------------- > 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S I'm still not convinced about this whole "move ASM to separate file" thing, especially now that you aren't actually adding any sunxi-specific ASM code beyond a simple function call. Could you drop this for now? ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists