linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 35/66] arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180417155647.391743183@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:59:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 35/66] arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>


From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>

commit f5115e8869e1dfafac0e414b4f1664f3a84a4683 upstream.

When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set
to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from
the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped).

Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever
stuck...

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: acfb3b883f6d ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls")
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> [v4.9 backport]
Tested-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -53,7 +53,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *v
 
 static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
+	/*
+	 * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is
+	 * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a
+	 * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
+	 *
+	 * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
+	 * otherwise return to the same address...
+	 */
 	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
+	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
 	return 1;
 }