| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180417155647.522384101@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:59:11 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 38/66] arm/arm64: KVM: Add smccc accessors to PSCI code
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
commit 84684fecd7ea381824a96634a027b7719587fb77 upstream.
Instead of open coding the accesses to the various registers,
let's add explicit SMCCC accessors.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
[v4.9: account for files moved to virt/ upstream]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> [v4.9 backport]
Tested-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/kvm/psci.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
@@ -32,6 +32,38 @@
#define AFFINITY_MASK(level) ~((0x1UL << ((level) * MPIDR_LEVEL_BITS)) - 1)
+static u32 smccc_get_function(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0);
+}
+
+static unsigned long smccc_get_arg1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 1);
+}
+
+static unsigned long smccc_get_arg2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 2);
+}
+
+static unsigned long smccc_get_arg3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 3);
+}
+
+static void smccc_set_retval(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ unsigned long a0,
+ unsigned long a1,
+ unsigned long a2,
+ unsigned long a3)
+{
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, a0);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 1, a1);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 2, a2);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 3, a3);
+}
+
static unsigned long psci_affinity_mask(unsigned long affinity_level)
{
if (affinity_level <= 3)
@@ -74,7 +106,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(st
unsigned long context_id;
phys_addr_t target_pc;
- cpu_id = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
+ cpu_id = smccc_get_arg1(source_vcpu) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(source_vcpu))
cpu_id &= ~((u32) 0);
@@ -93,8 +125,8 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(st
return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
}
- target_pc = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 2);
- context_id = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 3);
+ target_pc = smccc_get_arg2(source_vcpu);
+ context_id = smccc_get_arg3(source_vcpu);
kvm_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
@@ -113,7 +145,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(st
* NOTE: We always update r0 (or x0) because for PSCI v0.1
* the general puspose registers are undefined upon CPU_ON.
*/
- vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, context_id);
+ smccc_set_retval(vcpu, context_id, 0, 0, 0);
vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
smp_mb(); /* Make sure the above is visible */
@@ -133,8 +165,8 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_affin
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
- target_affinity = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 1);
- lowest_affinity_level = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 2);
+ target_affinity = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
+ lowest_affinity_level = smccc_get_arg2(vcpu);
/* Determine target affinity mask */
target_affinity_mask = psci_affinity_mask(lowest_affinity_level);
@@ -208,7 +240,7 @@ int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vc
static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
- unsigned long psci_fn = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
+ unsigned long psci_fn = smccc_get_function(vcpu);
unsigned long val;
int ret = 1;
@@ -275,14 +307,14 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_
break;
}
- vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val);
+ smccc_set_retval(vcpu, val, 0, 0, 0);
return ret;
}
static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
- unsigned long psci_fn = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
+ unsigned long psci_fn = smccc_get_function(vcpu);
unsigned long val;
switch (psci_fn) {
@@ -300,7 +332,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_
break;
}
- vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val);
+ smccc_set_retval(vcpu, val, 0, 0, 0);
return 1;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists