[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2284833.pBtR1QS54F@bentobox>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:07:27 +0200
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@...nmesh.com>
To: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
absahu@...eaurora.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [v5,05/13] ARM: dts: ipq4019: Add ipq4019-ap.dk04.dtsi
On Mittwoch, 18. April 2018 08:59:46 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote:
[...]
> I would not know how to disable QSEE on these boards and thus would assume
> that it should be part of this dtsi.
Just did some reviews of the reserved-memory regions in other QCA devices and
it looks like this tz and smem are often directly added to the SoC dtsi. So I
will prepare a similar change for qcom-ipq4019.dtsi and this would then solve
it for AP-DK01/04/07 and no changes in the board-family specific dtsi would be
necessary.
But maybe someone has an objection because tz and smem can actually be
disabled in a sane way on these SoCs and thus it would be better to have these
regions in the board specific dts(i) files. We will see...
Kind regards,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists