[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <734eb6eb-9af9-d599-81f1-ec66d9cd839c@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:45:20 +0530
From: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@...nmesh.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
absahu@...eaurora.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [v5,05/13] ARM: dts: ipq4019: Add ipq4019-ap.dk04.dtsi
Hi Sven,
On 4/18/2018 12:37 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 18. April 2018 08:59:46 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> [...]
>> I would not know how to disable QSEE on these boards and thus would assume
>> that it should be part of this dtsi.
>
>
> Just did some reviews of the reserved-memory regions in other QCA devices and
> it looks like this tz and smem are often directly added to the SoC dtsi. So I
> will prepare a similar change for qcom-ipq4019.dtsi and this would then solve
> it for AP-DK01/04/07 and no changes in the board-family specific dtsi would be
> necessary.
>
> But maybe someone has an objection because tz and smem can actually be
> disabled in a sane way on these SoCs and thus it would be better to have these
> regions in the board specific dts(i) files. We will see...
Right, will add the above change to soc.dtsi in V6. Does that sound ok for you ?
Regards,
Sricharan
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists