linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: dev: check i2c_msg len before memdup_user() to prevent ZERO_SIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92f44b44-a5a1-c844-4d96-db0697b2e090@linux.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:56:03 +0300
From:   Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sil2review@...ts.osadl.org,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: dev: check i2c_msg len before memdup_user() to
 prevent ZERO_SIZE_PTR deref

On 18.04.2018 10:07, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,

Hello Uwe,

Thanks for your reply.

> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:16:45AM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote:
>> Currently i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr() doesn't check i2c_msg len against zero
>> before calling memdup_user(). If this len is zero memdup_user() returns
>> ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which is later considered as valid since
>> IS_ERR(ZERO_SIZE_PTR) is false. That causes ZERO_SIZE_PTR deref oops.
> 
> You're saying that
> 
> 	memdup_user(ptr, 0)
> 
> reads from *ptr? I'd say this is a bug in memdup_user, not its user.

No, I don't say that.

memdup_user(ptr, 0) returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which is later considered as valid
since IS_ERR(ZERO_SIZE_PTR) is false:

	msgs[i].buf = memdup_user(data_ptrs[i], msgs[i].len);
	if (IS_ERR(msgs[i].buf)) {
		res = PTR_ERR(msgs[i].buf);
		break;
	}

That causes ZERO_SIZE_PTR deref oops after that:

root@...kaller:~# ./repro
[   22.015442] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
[   22.066965] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
[   22.068624] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
[   22.069705] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[   22.070399]    (ftrace buffer empty)
[   22.071033] Modules linked in:
[   22.071562] CPU: 0 PID: 3899 Comm: repro.exe Not tainted 4.17.0-rc1 #2
[   22.072632] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[   22.074219] RIP: 0010:i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr+0x12b/0x7b0
[   22.075023] RSP: 0018:ffff880061f3fa68 EFLAGS: 00010346
[   22.075877] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[   22.076973] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: ffff88006a2e9542
[   22.078086] RBP: ffff880061f3fac0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff880060b44780
[   22.079166] R10: 1ffff1000c3e7f1d R11: 0000000000000000 R12: dffffc0000000000
[   22.080251] R13: ffff88006a2e9540 R14: 0000000000000010 R15: 0000000000000001
[   22.081339] FS:  00000000020bc880(0000) GS:ffff88006ba00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[   22.082615] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   22.083526] CR2: 00000000200002c3 CR3: 000000006724a000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[   22.084631] Call Trace:
[   22.085501]  ? i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr+0xf/0x7b0
[   22.086865]  i2cdev_ioctl+0x4ec/0x940
[   22.088677]  ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[   22.090555]  ? i2cdev_ioctl_smbus+0x6a0/0x6a0
[   22.091862]  ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x1e0/0x1e0
[   22.092428]  ? kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20
[   22.092946]  ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
[   22.093451]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xa6/0xe0
[   22.094013]  ? debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x341/0x7eb
[   22.094547]  ? i2cdev_ioctl_smbus+0x6a0/0x6a0
[   22.095086]  do_vfs_ioctl+0x1cd/0x17b0
[   22.095482]  ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[   22.095978]  ? rcu_is_watching+0x7b/0x150
[   22.096428]  ? ioctl_preallocate+0x350/0x350
[   22.096908]  ? __fget_light+0x2fc/0x4c0
[   22.097351]  ? fget_raw+0x20/0x20
[   22.097721]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x31c/0x450
[   22.098164]  ? putname+0xfa/0x150
[   22.098511]  ? do_sys_open+0x31c/0x710
[   22.099792]  ? security_file_ioctl+0x8c/0xc0
[   22.102080]  ksys_ioctl+0x94/0xb0
[   22.103204]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7c/0xd0
[   22.103643]  do_syscall_64+0x193/0x920
[   22.104186]  ? trace_event_raw_event_sys_exit+0x2e0/0x2e0
[   22.105061]  ? syscall_return_slowpath+0x6a0/0x6a0
[   22.106717]  ? syscall_return_slowpath+0x2de/0x6a0
[   22.108183]  ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x59/0xbe
[   22.109597]  ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[   22.110167]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[   22.110735] RIP: 0033:0x44df89
[   22.111077] RSP: 002b:00007fff7fb01ca8 EFLAGS: 00000213 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[   22.111932] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000400418 RCX: 000000000044df89
[   22.112958] RDX: 0000000020000080 RSI: 0000000000000707 RDI: 0000000000000003
[   22.114078] RBP: 00007fff7fb01cc0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000401af0
[   22.115784] R10: 000000000000ffff R11: 0000000000000213 R12: 0000000000401b90
[   22.116870] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000006bd018 R15: 0000000000000000
[   22.117953] Code: 00 e8 7a 53 bd fb 41 83 e7 01 0f 84 e8 03 00 00 e8 6b 53 bd
fb 4d 85 f6 0f 84 12 06 00 00 4c 89 f0 4c 89 f1 48 c1 e8 03 83 e1 07 <42> 0f b6
04 20 38 c8 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 e7 05 00 00 45 0f b6 36
[   22.120532] RIP: i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr+0x12b/0x7b0 RSP: ffff880061f3fa68
[   22.121290] ---[ end trace b365c176b1d95614 ]---


> If however the problem only happens later in
> 
> 	if (msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN) {
> 		if (!(msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) || msgs[i].buf[0] < 1 || ...)

Yes, that's true. I think I should make the commit message more verbose. I'll
come with v2.

> Your commit log is wrong (and I think the patch, too).

I believe this bug is not a memdup_user() issue. There is a nice selection from
LKML discussions about ZERO_SIZE_PTR, which convinces me:
http://yarchive.net/comp/linux/malloc_0.html

Best regards,
Alexander