[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0155b3cc-29ce-fa43-5588-b465c6ee064a@axentia.se>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:02:12 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/atmel-hlcdc: add support for connecting to
tda998x HDMI encoder
On 2018-04-18 09:36, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:10:51 +0200
> Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:
>
>> When the of-graph points to a tda998x-compatible HDMI encoder, register
>> as a component master and bind to the encoder/connector provided by
>> the tda998x driver.
>
> Can't we do the opposite: make the tda998x driver expose its devices as
> drm bridges. I'd rather not add another way to connect external
> encoders (or bridges) to display controller drivers, especially since,
> when I asked DRM maintainers/devs what was the good approach to
> represent such external encoders they pointed me to the drm_bridge
> interface.
>From the cover letter:
"However, I don't know if the tilcdc driver is interfacing with the
tda998x driver in a sane and modern way"
So, which way is the future? Should bridges become components or should
existing bridge-like components no longer be components? Are there others?
Cheers,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists