[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxLY2=RVAD8m-3bf4vKWpPKWSmjN_tLVWwb4Y7w81UTbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:07:04 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ilog2: create truly constant version for sparse
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com> wrote:
> Sparse emits errors about ilog2() in array indices because of the use of
> __ilog2_32() and __ilog2_64(),
If sparse warns about it, then presumably gcc with -Wvla warns about it too?
And if thats the case, then __builtin_constant_p() and a ternary
operation isn't good enough, because gcc -Wvla is even more anal than
sparse is.
Which is why we have that __is_constexpr() magic for min/max().
So I suspect that what you'd want is
#define ilog2(n) \
__builtin_choose_expr(__is_constexpr(n), \
const_ilog2(n), \
__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(n) <= 4, \
__ilog2_u32(n), \
__ilog2_u64(n)))
or something. Hmm?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists