[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180418084535.lqdvjgcbxtnwqwri@flea>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:45:35 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Simon <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"open list:ARM/SHMOBILE ARM..." <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] ARM: sunxi: smp: Move assembly code into a file
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:25:15PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:50 AM, Mylène Josserand
> >> <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >> > Move the assembly code for cluster cache enabling and resuming
> >> > into an assembly file instead of having it directly in C code.
> >> >
> >> > Remove the CFLAGS because we are using the ARM directive "arch"
> >> > instead.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile | 4 +--
> >> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 82 +++----------------------------------------
> >> > 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> >> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S
> >>
> >> I'm still not convinced about this whole "move ASM to separate
> >> file" thing, especially now that you aren't actually adding any
> >> sunxi-specific ASM code beyond a simple function call.
> >>
> >> Could you drop this for now?
> >
> > I'd really like to have this merged actually. There's a significant
> > readibility improvement, so even if there's no particular functional
> > improvement, I'd still call it a win.
>
> What parts do you consider hard to read? The extra quotes? Trailing
> newline? Or perhaps the __stringify bits?
All of this, plus the clobbers and operands.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists