lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de059c45-d706-ff70-9063-92ac0a807e26@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:36:37 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version

On 18/04/2018 11:03, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> QEMU setting ucode_rev automatically using the host value when
>>> using "-cpu host" (with no need for explicit ucode_rev option)
>>> makes sense to me.
>> QEMU can't get the host value by rdmsr MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV directly
>> since rdmsr will #GP when ring !=0, any idea?
> By looking at kvm_get_msr_feature(), it looks like
> ioctl(system_fd, KVM_GET_MSRS) would return the host MSR value
> for us.

Yes, that's exactly what it was introduced for (together with other MSRs
including VMX capabilities).

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ