linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] parisc: define stronger ordering for the default readX()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8c3391d-7109-47bf-e1c4-9217fc68bfd0@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:39:30 -0400
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, timur@...eaurora.org,
        sulrich@...eaurora.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] parisc: define stronger ordering for the default
 readX()

On 4/17/2018 6:53 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2018-04-17 2:28 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> The correct terminology here would be to use observability. Yes, it can be
>> cached in whatever part of the system for some amount of time as long as
>> PCI device sees it in the correct order.
>>
>> Let's do this exercise.
>> 1. OS writes to memory for some descriptor update
>> 2. OS writes to the device via writel to hit a doorbell
>> 3. Device comes and fetches the memory contents for the descriptor
>>
>> writel() of PA-RISC needs to ensure that 3. cannot bypass 1. This is typically
>> done by a write barrier embedded into the writel() on relaxed architectures.
> The sequence point after the argument evaluation for writel prevents the compiler from reordering
> 1 and 2.  Accesses to I/O space are strongly ordered on PA-RISC, so 1 must occur before 2 (Page G-1
> of the PA-RISC 2.0 Architecture).  Thus, the current code is okay.
> 

Many thanks for the clarification.

> Dave
> 


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.