| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <MWHPR2101MB0729A5CE8F2D52371AD239C6CEB60@MWHPR2101MB0729.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:53:53 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
"linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
"samba-technical@...ts.samba.org" <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v3 2/6] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation request
through kmalloc
> Subject: Re: [Patch v3 2/6] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation request through
> kmalloc
>
> On 4/18/2018 1:16 PM, Long Li wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [Patch v3 2/6] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation
> >> request through kmalloc
> >>
> >> Two comments.
> >>
> >> On 4/17/2018 8:33 PM, Long Li wrote:
> >>> From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> >>>
> >>> The data buffer allocated on the stack can't be DMA'ed, and hence
> >>> can't send through RDMA via SMB Direct.
> >>
> >> This comment is confusing. Any registered memory can be DMA'd, need
> >> to state the reason for the choice here more clearly.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Fix this by allocating the request on the heap in
> smb3_validate_negotiate.
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> Removed duplicated code on freeing buffers on function exit.
> >>> (Thanks to Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>) Fixed typo in the
> >>> patch title.
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v3:
> >>> Added "Fixes" to the patch.
> >>> Changed sizeof() to use *pointer in place of struct.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: ff1c038addc4 ("Check SMB3 dialects against downgrade
> >>> attacks")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> >>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >>> ---
> >>> fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c | 59
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >> -----------
> >>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c index
> >>> 0f044c4..5582a02 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
> >>> @@ -729,8 +729,8 @@ SMB2_negotiate(const unsigned int xid, struct
> >>> cifs_ses *ses)
> >>>
> >>> int smb3_validate_negotiate(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon
> *tcon)
> >>> {
> >>> - int rc = 0;
> >>> - struct validate_negotiate_info_req vneg_inbuf;
> >>> + int ret, rc = -EIO;
> >>> + struct validate_negotiate_info_req *pneg_inbuf;
> >>> struct validate_negotiate_info_rsp *pneg_rsp = NULL;
> >>> u32 rsplen;
> >>> u32 inbuflen; /* max of 4 dialects */ @@ -741,6 +741,9 @@ int
> >>> smb3_validate_negotiate(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon)
> >>> if (tcon->ses->server->rdma)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> #endif
> >>> + pneg_inbuf = kmalloc(sizeof(*pneg_inbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> + if (!pneg_inbuf)
> >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> Why is this a nonblocking allocation? It would seem more robust to
> >> use GFP_NOFS here.
> >
> > I agree it makes sense to use GFP_NOFS.
> >
> > The choice here is made consistent with all the rest CIFS code allocating
> protocol request buffers. Maybe we should do another patch to cleanup all
> those code.
>
> It'll be required sooner or later. I'm agnostic as to how you apply it, but I still
> suggest you change this one now rather than continue the fragile behavior. It
> may not be a global search-and-replace since some allocations may require
> nonblocking.
Okay, I will fix this.
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> Tom.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> /* In SMB3.11 preauth integrity supersedes validate negotiate */
> >>> if (tcon->ses->server->dialect == SMB311_PROT_ID) @@ -764,63
> >>> +767,63 @@ int smb3_validate_negotiate(const unsigned int xid,
> >>> +struct
> >> cifs_tcon *tcon)
> >>> if (tcon->ses->session_flags & SMB2_SESSION_FLAG_IS_NULL)
> >>> cifs_dbg(VFS, "Unexpected null user (anonymous) auth flag
> >> sent by
> >>> server\n");
> >>>
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.Capabilities =
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->Capabilities =
> >>> cpu_to_le32(tcon->ses->server->vals-
> >>> req_capabilities);
> >>> - memcpy(vneg_inbuf.Guid, tcon->ses->server->client_guid,
> >>> + memcpy(pneg_inbuf->Guid, tcon->ses->server->client_guid,
> >>> SMB2_CLIENT_GUID_SIZE);
> >>>
> >>> if (tcon->ses->sign)
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.SecurityMode =
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->SecurityMode =
> >>>
> >> cpu_to_le16(SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_REQUIRED);
> >>> else if (global_secflags & CIFSSEC_MAY_SIGN)
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.SecurityMode =
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->SecurityMode =
> >>>
> >> cpu_to_le16(SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_ENABLED);
> >>> else
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.SecurityMode = 0;
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->SecurityMode = 0;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> if (strcmp(tcon->ses->server->vals->version_string,
> >>> SMB3ANY_VERSION_STRING) == 0) {
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.Dialects[0] = cpu_to_le16(SMB30_PROT_ID);
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.Dialects[1] = cpu_to_le16(SMB302_PROT_ID);
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.DialectCount = cpu_to_le16(2);
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->Dialects[0] = cpu_to_le16(SMB30_PROT_ID);
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->Dialects[1] = cpu_to_le16(SMB302_PROT_ID);
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->DialectCount = cpu_to_le16(2);
> >>> /* structure is big enough for 3 dialects, sending only 2 */
> >>> inbuflen = sizeof(struct validate_negotiate_info_req) - 2;
> >>> } else if (strcmp(tcon->ses->server->vals->version_string,
> >>> SMBDEFAULT_VERSION_STRING) == 0) {
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.Dialects[0] = cpu_to_le16(SMB21_PROT_ID);
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.Dialects[1] = cpu_to_le16(SMB30_PROT_ID);
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.Dialects[2] = cpu_to_le16(SMB302_PROT_ID);
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.DialectCount = cpu_to_le16(3);
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->Dialects[0] = cpu_to_le16(SMB21_PROT_ID);
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->Dialects[1] = cpu_to_le16(SMB30_PROT_ID);
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->Dialects[2] = cpu_to_le16(SMB302_PROT_ID);
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->DialectCount = cpu_to_le16(3);
> >>> /* structure is big enough for 3 dialects */
> >>> inbuflen = sizeof(struct validate_negotiate_info_req);
> >>> } else {
> >>> /* otherwise specific dialect was requested */
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.Dialects[0] =
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->Dialects[0] =
> >>> cpu_to_le16(tcon->ses->server->vals->protocol_id);
> >>> - vneg_inbuf.DialectCount = cpu_to_le16(1);
> >>> + pneg_inbuf->DialectCount = cpu_to_le16(1);
> >>> /* structure is big enough for 3 dialects, sending only 1 */
> >>> inbuflen = sizeof(struct validate_negotiate_info_req) - 4;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - rc = SMB2_ioctl(xid, tcon, NO_FILE_ID, NO_FILE_ID,
> >>> + ret = SMB2_ioctl(xid, tcon, NO_FILE_ID, NO_FILE_ID,
> >>> FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO, true /* is_fsctl */,
> >>> - (char *)&vneg_inbuf, sizeof(struct
> >> validate_negotiate_info_req),
> >>> + (char *)pneg_inbuf, sizeof(*pneg_inbuf),
> >>> (char **)&pneg_rsp, &rsplen);
> >>>
> >>> - if (rc != 0) {
> >>> - cifs_dbg(VFS, "validate protocol negotiate failed: %d\n", rc);
> >>> - return -EIO;
> >>> + if (ret) {
> >>> + cifs_dbg(VFS, "validate protocol negotiate failed: %d\n", ret);
> >>> + goto out_free_inbuf;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - if (rsplen != sizeof(struct validate_negotiate_info_rsp)) {
> >>> + if (rsplen != sizeof(*pneg_rsp)) {
> >>> cifs_dbg(VFS, "invalid protocol negotiate response
> >> size: %d\n",
> >>> rsplen);
> >>>
> >>> /* relax check since Mac returns max bufsize allowed on ioctl
> >> */
> >>> if ((rsplen > CIFSMaxBufSize)
> >>> || (rsplen < sizeof(struct validate_negotiate_info_rsp)))
> >>> - goto err_rsp_free;
> >>> + goto out_free_rsp;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /* check validate negotiate info response matches what we got
> >>> earlier */ @@ -838,14 +841,16 @@ int smb3_validate_negotiate(const
> >>> unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon)
> >>>
> >>> /* validate negotiate successful */
> >>> cifs_dbg(FYI, "validate negotiate info successful\n");
> >>> - kfree(pneg_rsp);
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> + rc = 0;
> >>> + goto out_free_rsp;
> >>>
> >>> vneg_out:
> >>> cifs_dbg(VFS, "protocol revalidation - security settings
> >>> mismatch\n");
> >>> -err_rsp_free:
> >>> +out_free_rsp:
> >>> kfree(pneg_rsp);
> >>> - return -EIO;
> >>> +out_free_inbuf:
> >>> + kfree(pneg_inbuf);
> >>> + return rc;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> enum securityEnum
> >>>
> > N r y b X ǧv ^ ){.n + { ٚ {ay .ʇڙ ,j f h z . w
>
> j:+v w j m zZ+ ݢj" !tml=
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists