[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180419044743.srjhqegvir5exub5@ast-mbp>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:47:45 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] samples/bpf: Refine printing symbol for
sampleip
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 09:34:05AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> The code defines macro 'PAGE_OFFSET' and uses it to decide if the
> address is in kernel space or not. But different architecture has
> different 'PAGE_OFFSET' so this program cannot be used for all
> platforms.
>
> This commit changes to check returned pointer from ksym_search() to
> judge if the address falls into kernel space or not, and removes
> macro 'PAGE_OFFSET' as it isn't used anymore. As result, this program
> has no architecture dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
> samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c b/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> index 4ed690b..0eea1b3 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
> #define DEFAULT_FREQ 99
> #define DEFAULT_SECS 5
> #define MAX_IPS 8192
> -#define PAGE_OFFSET 0xffff880000000000
>
> static int nr_cpus;
>
> @@ -107,14 +106,13 @@ static void print_ip_map(int fd)
> /* sort and print */
> qsort(counts, max, sizeof(struct ipcount), count_cmp);
> for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
> - if (counts[i].ip > PAGE_OFFSET) {
> - sym = ksym_search(counts[i].ip);
yes. it is x64 specific, since it's a sample code,
but simply removing it is not a fix.
It makes this sampleip code behaving incorrectly.
To do such 'cleanup of ksym' please refactor it in the true generic way,
so these ksym* helpers can work on all archs and put this new
functionality into selftests.
If you can convert these examples into proper self-checking tests
that run out of selftests that would be awesome.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists