[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d37a1c5a6505416bbc77a2dc5f76a714@ausx13mpc120.AMER.DELL.COM>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:30:38 +0000
From: <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
To: <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>, <dgilmore@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: issues with suspend on Dell XPS 13 2-in-1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pandruvada, Srinivas [mailto:srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 11:37 PM
> To: dgilmore@...hat.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> acpi@...r.kernel.org; Limonciello, Mario
> Subject: Re: issues with suspend on Dell XPS 13 2-in-1
>
> On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 21:01 +0000, Mario.Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > [...]
>
> > > > Srinivas,
> > > >
> > > > Do you know why Runtime PM is defaulting to disabled for all of
> > > > these
> > > > devices? Is that a default kernel policy problem or a distro
> > > > policy
> > > > problem?
> > >
> > > This is default kernel policy.
> >
> > Why is policy set this way by default in kernel? Could we discuss to
> > change
> > Default kernel policy so that users can get better power consumption
> > by default
> Good question. This was discussed before, the problem is that it can
> cause some issues with legacy devices.
If the concern is legacy devices, what about flipping default policy when
it's say SKL or newer?
> It should be better done in user
> space by some policy in gnome power manager, which user can
> enable/disable.
Sure, I think letting userspace change the policy if a user wants to turn
It off makes sense. What I'm hoping to accomplish however is a better
default policy however since most users should prefer more battery
life, and "power users" would be the ones to further tune for their
preferred usage.
>
> >
> > I think it will be especially important as more machines continue to
> > adopt
> > suspend-to-idle.
> Those should impact opportunistic idle since for S2I regular suspend
> callbacks are called. In my 9365, I can get PC10 during S2I path
> without adjusting them. Only problematic is systems with SATA, where we
> need to enable devsleep.
Hmm, Dennis did mention that he had an NVME disk, so it can't be a devsleep
problem.
Perhaps can you also share your kernel config used with 9365 so Dennis
can compare?
I believe we'll need to see some more information from Dennis you asked
in previous email before we can make more progress here though.
> >
> > > I suggest run
> > > #turbostat
> > > then suspend and wake
> > > when wake up let the turbostat collect data for next sampling
> > > interval.
> > > We have to see what are PkgC% residencies are?
> >
> > Assuming you mean for Dan to run this after he adjusts all the PM
> > settings
> > for those options power top called out, right?
> It is better.
> May be some device is not behaving correctly. So he can try with
> powertop --auto-tune and check turbostat and see status of PkgC states.
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Srinivas
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Good Bluetooth device interface status
> > > > > Good Enable Audio codec power management
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for I2C Adapter i2c-8 (Synopsys
> > > > > DesignWare
> > > > > I2C adapter)
> > > > > Good Autosuspend for USB device
> > > > > Integrated_Webcam_HD
> > > > > [CNFGE16N092020028362]
> > > > > Good Autosuspend for USB device xHCI Host
> > > > > Controller
> > > > > [usb1]
> > > > > Good Autosuspend for USB device xHCI Host
> > > > > Controller
> > > > > [usb2]
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for I2C Adapter i2c-7 (SMBus I801
> > > > > adapter
> > > > > at efa0)
> > > > > Good Autosuspend for unknown USB device 1-2
> > > > > (8087:0a2b)
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for I2C Adapter i2c-6 (Synopsys
> > > > > DesignWare
> > > > > I2C adapter)
> > > > > Good I2C Device i2c-DLL077A:01 has no runtime power
> > > > > management
> > > > > Good I2C Device i2c-WCOM482F:00 has no runtime
> > > > > power
> > > > > management
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for PCI Device Intel Corporation
> > > > > Sunrise
> > > > > Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #10
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for PCI Device Intel Corporation
> > > > > Sunrise
> > > > > Point-LP CSME HECI #1
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for PCI Device Intel Corporation
> > > > > Sunrise
> > > > > Point-LP Serial IO I2C Controller #1
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for PCI Device Intel Corporation
> > > > > Sunrise
> > > > > Point-LP SMBus
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for PCI Device Intel Corporation
> > > > > Sunrise
> > > > > Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #5
> > > > > Good Runtime PM for PCI Device Intel Corporation
> > > > > Sunrise
> > > > > Point-LP Serial IO I2C Controller #0
> > > > > Good Wake-on-lan status for device virbr0-nic
> > > > > Good Wake-on-lan status for device virbr0
> > > > > Good Wake-on-lan status for device wlp60s0
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists