lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBQu8KfU4k_-TcBh3c+cvTJDibQkZmeo4Tv3HRvHhqz8YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:10:39 +0000
From:   Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oskar Senft <osk@...gle.com>, mark@...dzero.net,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix SBOX support for
 Broadwell CPUs

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 6:12 AM Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> From: Oskar Senft <osk@...gle.com>

> This fixes SBOX support for Broadwell CPUs by checking the Power Control
> Unit CAPID4 register to determine the number of available SBOXes on the
> particular CPU before trying to enable them.

> Signed-off-by: Oskar Senft <osk@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Mark van Dijk <mark@...dzero.net>
> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>

Could you please merge this change?
Thanks.

> ---
>   arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> index 47c6910..715eb14 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> @@ -3060,6 +3060,8 @@ static struct event_constraint
bdx_uncore_pcu_constraints[] = {

>   void bdx_uncore_cpu_init(void)
>   {
> +       int pkg = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(0);
> +
>          if (bdx_uncore_cbox.num_boxes > boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores)
>                  bdx_uncore_cbox.num_boxes = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
>          uncore_msr_uncores = bdx_msr_uncores;
> @@ -3067,7 +3069,15 @@ void bdx_uncore_cpu_init(void)
>          /* BDX-DE doesn't have SBOX */
>          if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 86)
>                  uncore_msr_uncores[BDX_MSR_UNCORE_SBOX] = NULL;
> -
> +       /* Detect systems with no SBOXes */
> +       else if (uncore_extra_pci_dev[pkg].dev[HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3]) {
> +               u32 capid4;
> +               pci_read_config_dword(
> +                       uncore_extra_pci_dev[pkg].dev[HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3],
> +                       0x94, &capid4);
> +               if (((capid4 >> 6) & 0x3) == 0)
> +                       bdx_msr_uncores[BDX_MSR_UNCORE_SBOX] = NULL;
> +       }
>          hswep_uncore_pcu.constraints = bdx_uncore_pcu_constraints;
>   }

> @@ -3285,6 +3295,11 @@ static const struct pci_device_id
bdx_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
>                  PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f46),
>                  .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
2),
>          },
> +       { /* PCU.3 (for Capability registers) */
> +               PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fc0),
> +               .driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV,
> +                                                  HSWEP_PCI_PCU_3),
> +       },
>          { /* end: all zeroes */ }
>   };

> --
> 2.4.11

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ