[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180419065711-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:00:53 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Joby Poriyath <joby.poriyath@...rix.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: don't use kvzalloc for DMA memory
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 01:38:43PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 04/18/2018 10:55 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > Imagine you want to pass some data to card.
> > Natural thing is to just put it in a variable and start DMA.
> > However DMA API disallows stack access nowdays,
> > so it's natural to put this within struct device.
> >
> > See e.g.
> >
> > commit a725ee3e44e39dab1ec82cc745899a785d2a555e
> > Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> > Date: Mon Jul 18 15:34:49 2016 -0700
> >
> > virtio-net: Remove more stack DMA
> >
>
> Andy just moved the problem to another one, since at that time we already
> had vmalloc() fallback for at least 2 years.
>
> Note that my original patch had :
>
> p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
> if (!p)
> p = vzalloc(alloc_size);
>
> So really, normal (less than PAGE_SIZE) allocations would have almost-zero-chance to end up to vmalloc(one_page)
Thanks Eric, I'll fix virtio.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists