[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUX9dJcGLgftAAeCOXYxKUOQ_dW7=oLwNt5VRbd6nQpuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 08:28:28 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] clk: Extract OF clock helpers in <linux/of_clk.h>
Hi Stephen, Rob,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-04-18 07:50:01)
>> The use of of_clk_get_parent_{count,name}() and of_clk_init() is not
>> limited to clock providers.
>>
>> Hence move these helpers into their own header file, so callers that are
>> not clock providers no longer have to include <linux/clk-provider.h>.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> - Add Reviewed-by,
>> - Add SPDX-License-Identifier,
>> - Add to clock section in MAINTAINERS (note that Rob is still listed
>> as a maintainer, too, due to the include/linux/of*.h catch-all
>> rule),
>
> Can you X: out this file so Rob is happy? Or that doesn't work?
I guess that should work.
My point here is that due to the catch-all rule, he's listed as maintainer
for of_{dma,gpio,irq,iommu,mdio,net,pci} too, which are all helpers for
other subsystems. Perhaps these should be X'd-out too?
Or is it OK without X-ing them out, as the clock maintainers are now shown, too?
Rob: What's your preference?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists