[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFXWsS9L+9tJX_yqoC9qYKD39ninS2JfqmU9Yec580aUgkEyrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:25:40 +1000
From: Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorrison@...il.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Srivatsa, Anusha" <anusha.srivatsa@...el.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
"Wajdeczko, Michal" <Michal.Wajdeczko@...el.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake
On 20 April 2018 at 17:50, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorrison@...il.com> wrote:
>> I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows:
>
> What testing did you do beyond booting? Did you run igt?
>
> BR,
> Jani.
I did some basic testing including running a 4K video on Chrome whilst
running intel_gpu_top. The intel_gpu_top program doesn't display
anything on 4.12 either with or without the patch as neither I nor
Canonical enabled CONFIG_DRM_I915_ALPHA_SUPPORT. Do you think that the
stable tag should exclude 4.12 because of the 'alpha quality support'
and if so do you want a V2 of the patch?
Best regards,
Ian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists