lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:10:04 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     brouer@...hat.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] samples/bpf: Fix typo in comment


On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:34:02 +0800 Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:

> Fix typo by replacing 'iif' with 'if'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
>  samples/bpf/bpf_load.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
> index bebe418..28e4678 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int load_elf_maps_section(struct bpf_map_data *maps, int maps_shndx,
>  			continue;
>  		if (sym[nr_maps].st_shndx != maps_shndx)
>  			continue;
> -		/* Only increment iif maps section */
> +		/* Only increment if maps section */
>  		nr_maps++;
>  	}

This was actually not a typo from my side.

With 'iif' I mean 'if and only if' ... but it doesn't matter much.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ