[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180420015221.GA6397@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:52:21 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] printk: wake up klogd in vprintk_emit
On (04/19/18 12:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2018-04-19 10:42:50, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > We wake up klogd very late - only when current console_sem owner
> > is done pushing pending kernel messages to the serial/net consoles.
> > In some cases this results in lost syslog messages, because kernel
> > log buffer is a circular buffer and if we don't wakeup syslog long
> > enough there are chances that logbuf simply will wrap around.
> >
> > The patch moves the klog wake up call to vprintk_emit(), which is
> > the only legit way for a kernel message to appear in the logbuf,
> > right before we attempt to grab the console_sem (possibly spinning
> > on it waiting for the hand off) and call console drivers.
>
> The last two lines need an update. What about?
Ah. Indeed!
> "right after the attempt to handle consoles. As a result, klog
> will get waken either after flushing the new message to consoles
> or immediately when consoles are still busy with older messages."
Looks good. Do you want me to resend the patch?
> Otherwise, it looks nice:
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Thanks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists