[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180420130727.GV2173@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 16:07:27 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, graeme.gregory@...aro.org, helgaas@...nel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PNP: Don't add "enumeration_by_parent"
devices
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:07:25PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> + } else {
> + device->driver_data = dev;
I think this deserves a comment explaining why we (ab)use driver_data
like this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists