lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:09:51 +0200
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i2c: tda998x: register as a drm bridge

On 2018-04-20 12:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> Yup, right you are!
>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
>>> [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1 next-20180420]
>>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>>>
>>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Peter-Rosin/Add-tda998x-HDMI-support-to-atmel-hlcdc/20180420-160131
>>> base:   git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-next
>>> config: i386-randconfig-a0-201815 (attached as .config)
>>> compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4
>>> reproduce:
>>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>         make ARCH=i386 
>>>
>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c: In function 'tda998x_probe':
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c:1859:16: error: 'struct drm_bridge' has no member named 'of_node'
>>>      bridge->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node;
>>>                    ^
>>
>> Anybody got a better fix than this?
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> 	bridge->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node;
>> #endif
> 
> How about the bridge code provides a helper to do this, something like:
> 
> static inline void bridge_set_device(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> 				     struct device *dev)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> 	bridge->of_node = dev->of_node;
> #endif
> }
> 
> which (a) nicely hides the firmware flavour, and (b) hides the ifdef in
> the bridge header where it belongs.  If the bridge code needs to be
> converted to fwnode in the future, at least this would be abstracted
> from the drivers.
> 

Hmm, I looked around and found numerous other #ifdefs for this, so my plan
is to just add one more. Fixing up all these ifdefs is orthogonal and can
be done later.

Cheers,
Peter

PS. I also noted that I had forgotten to remove a couple of dev_info calls
in this patch. Will remove for v4.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ