linux-kernel - [PATCH 16/17] perf test BPF: Fixup BPF test using epoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:32:26 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] perf test BPF: Fixup BPF test using epoll_pwait syscall function probe

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

Since e145242ea0df ("syscalls/core, syscalls/x86: Clean up syscall stub
naming convention") changed the main syscall function for 'epoll_pwait'
to something other than the expected 'SyS_epoll_pwait the' 'perf test
BPF' entries started failing, fix it by using something called from the
main syscall function instead, 'epoll_wait', which should keep this test
working in older kernels too.

Before:

  # perf test BPF
  40: BPF filter                           :
  40.1: Basic BPF filtering                : FAILED!
  40.2: BPF pinning                        : Skip
  40.3: BPF prologue generation            : Skip
  40.4: BPF relocation checker             : Skip

If we use -v for that test we see the problem:

    Probe point 'SyS_epoll_pwait' not found.

After:

  # perf test BPF
  40: BPF filter                           :
  40.1: Basic BPF filtering                : Ok
  40.2: BPF pinning                        : Ok
  40.3: BPF prologue generation            : Ok
  40.4: BPF relocation checker             : Ok
  #

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/tip-y24nmn70cs2am8jh4i344dng@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
index e4123c1b0e88..1ca5106df5f1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") flip_table = {
 	.max_entries = 1,
 };
 
-SEC("func=SyS_epoll_pwait")
+SEC("func=do_epoll_wait")
 int bpf_func__SyS_epoll_pwait(void *ctx)
 {
 	int ind =0;
-- 
2.14.3