[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0nL4B+t6BMRhr36RrZ_jDgwnY1BviNPD+cFzsUGeppmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 16:38:29 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
Cc: "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@...ev.fr>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"open list:RALINK MIPS ARCHITECTURE" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Daniel Schepler <dschepler@...il.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>, tg@...bsd.de,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ipc: fix x32 version of shmid64_ds and msqid64_ds
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> wrote:
>> +#if !defined(__x86_64__) || !defined(__ilp32__)
>> #include <asm-generic/msgbuf.h>
>> +#else
>
> I understand there's some progress having Clang compile the kernel.
> Clang treats __ILP32__ and friends differently than GCC. I believe
> ILP32 shows up just about everywhere there are 32-bit ints, longs and
> pointers. You might find it on Aarch64 or you might find it on MIPS64
> when using Clang.
>
> I think that means this may be a little suspicious:
>
> > +#if !defined(__x86_64__) || !defined(__ilp32__)
>
> I kind of felt LLVM was wandering away from the x32 ABI, but the LLVM
> devs insisted they were within their purview. Also see
> https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-December/046300.html.
>
> Sorry about the top-post. I just wanted to pick out that one piece.
It seems I made a typo and it needs to be __ILP32__ rather than
__ilp32__ (corrected that locally, will resend once we have resolved
this).
Aside from that, the #if check seems to be correct to me: this
is an x86-specific header, so it won't ever be seen on other
architectures. On x86-32, __x86_64__ isn't set, so we don't care
about whether __ilp32__ is set or not, and on x86-64 (lp64),
__ilp32__ is never set, so we still get the asm-generic header.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists