[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7074fe36-27c5-ee82-9659-da703cfc91fe@kot-begemot.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:06:10 +0100
From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
"user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault
in relay_signal.
On 04/20/18 15:38, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Today user mode linux only works on x86 and x86_64 and this allows
> simplifications of relay_signal.
I believe someone recently fixed the ARM port. I have not had the time
to try the fixes though.
I have added the new list we are migrating to the cc list.
A.
>
> - x86 always set si_errno to 0 in fault handlers.
> - x86 does not implement si_trapno.
> - Only si_codes between SI_USER and SI_KERNEL have a fault address.
>
> Therefore warn if si_errno is set (it should never be).
> Use force_sig_info in the case where we know we have a good fault.
>
> For signals whose content it is not clear how to relay use plain
> force_sig and let the signal sending code come up with an
> appropriate generic siginfo.
>
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
> arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> index d4d38520c4c6..5f0ff17cd790 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> @@ -296,9 +296,6 @@ unsigned long segv(struct faultinfo fi, unsigned long ip, int is_user,
>
> void relay_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - struct faultinfo *fi;
> - struct siginfo clean_si;
> -
> if (!UPT_IS_USER(regs)) {
> if (sig == SIGBUS)
> printk(KERN_ERR "Bus error - the host /dev/shm or /tmp "
> @@ -308,29 +305,30 @@ void relay_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
>
> arch_examine_signal(sig, regs);
>
> - clear_siginfo(&clean_si);
> - clean_si.si_signo = si->si_signo;
> - clean_si.si_errno = si->si_errno;
> - clean_si.si_code = si->si_code;
> + if (unlikely(si->si_errno)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Attempted to relay signal %d (si_code = %d) with errno %d\n",
> + sig, si->si_code, si->si_errno);
> + }
> switch (sig) {
> case SIGILL:
> case SIGFPE:
> case SIGSEGV:
> case SIGBUS:
> case SIGTRAP:
> - fi = UPT_FAULTINFO(regs);
> - clean_si.si_addr = (void __user *) FAULT_ADDRESS(*fi);
> - current->thread.arch.faultinfo = *fi;
> -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> - clean_si.si_trapno = si->si_trapno;
> -#endif
> - break;
> + if ((si->si_code > SI_USER) && (si->si_code < SI_KERNEL)) {
> + struct faultinfo *fi = UPT_FAULTINFO(regs);
> + current->thread.arch.faultinfo = *fi;
> + force_sig_fault(sig, si->si_code,
> + (void __user *)FAULT_ADDRESS(*fi),
> + current);
> + break;
> + }
> default:
> printk(KERN_ERR "Attempted to relay unknown signal %d (si_code = %d)\n",
> sig, si->si_code);
> }
>
> - force_sig_info(sig, &clean_si, current);
> + force_sig(sig, current);
> }
>
> void bus_handler(int sig, struct siginfo *si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists