[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180420032947.23023-1-msalter@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 23:29:47 -0400
From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To: Frédéric Danis
<frederic.danis.oss@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Fix regression related to X-Gene UARTs
Commit e361d1f85855 ("ACPI / scan: Fix enumeration for special UART
devices") caused a regression with some X-Gene based platforms (Mustang
and M400) with invalid DSDT. The DSDT makes it appear that the UART
device is also a slave device attached to itself. With the above commit
the UART won't be enumerated by ACPI scan (slave serial devices shouldn't
be). So check for X-Gene UART device and skip slace device check on it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index cc234e6a6297..1dcdd0122862 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1551,6 +1551,14 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
fwnode_property_present(&device->fwnode, "baud")))
return true;
+ /*
+ * Firmware on some arm64 X-Gene platforms will make the UART
+ * device appear as both a UART and a slave of that UART. Just
+ * bail out here for X-Gene UARTs.
+ */
+ if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(device), "APMC0D08"))
+ return false;
+
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
acpi_dev_get_resources(device, &resource_list,
acpi_check_serial_bus_slave,
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists