linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm: renesas: Change platform dependency to ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180420164811.GC22369@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:48:11 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm: renesas: Change platform dependency to
 ARCH_RENESAS

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 03:28:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> The first 6 patches can be applied independently by subsystem
> maintainers.
> The last two patches depend on the first 6 patches, and are thus marked
> RFC.

Would it not make sense to try to apply everything en masse rather than
delaying?  I'm happy to apply the subsystem stuff but if it gets things
done quicker or more efficiently I'm also happy to have the lot merged
as one series.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)