Message-Id: <E1f9ZSv-0004Zn-Ml@debutante>
Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:04:53 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
        evgreen@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: Don't return or expect -errno from of_map_mode()" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: Don't return or expect -errno from of_map_mode()

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 02f3703934a42417021405ef336fe45add13c3d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 08:54:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Don't return or expect -errno from of_map_mode()

In of_get_regulation_constraints() we were taking the result of
of_map_mode() (an unsigned int) and assigning it to an int.  We were
then checking whether this value was -EINVAL.  Some implementers of
of_map_mode() were returning -EINVAL (even though the return type of
their function needed to be unsigned int) because they needed to
signal an error back to of_get_regulation_constraints().

In general in the regulator framework the mode is always referred to
as an unsigned int.  While we could fix this to be a signed int (the
highest value we store in there right now is 0x8), it's actually
pretty clean to just define the regulator mode 0x0 (the lack of any
bits set) as an invalid mode.  Let's do that.

Fixes: 5e5e3a42c653 ("regulator: of: Add support for parsing initial and suspend modes")
Suggested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c |  2 +-
 drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c    | 13 +++++++------
 drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c   |  2 +-
 include/linux/regulator/consumer.h  |  1 +
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
index f541b80f1b54..bd910fe123d9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static unsigned int cpcap_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
 	case CPCAP_BIT_AUDIO_LOW_PWR:
 		return REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY;
 	default:
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID;
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
index f47264fa1940..0d3f73eacb99 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,
 	struct regulation_constraints *constraints = &(*init_data)->constraints;
 	struct regulator_state *suspend_state;
 	struct device_node *suspend_np;
+	unsigned int mode;
 	int ret, i;
 	u32 pval;
 
@@ -124,11 +125,11 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,
 
 	if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "regulator-initial-mode", &pval)) {
 		if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
-			ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
-			if (ret == -EINVAL)
+			mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
+			if (mode == REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID)
 				pr_err("%s: invalid mode %u\n", np->name, pval);
 			else
-				constraints->initial_mode = ret;
+				constraints->initial_mode = mode;
 		} else {
 			pr_warn("%s: mapping for mode %d not defined\n",
 				np->name, pval);
@@ -163,12 +164,12 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,
 		if (!of_property_read_u32(suspend_np, "regulator-mode",
 					  &pval)) {
 			if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
-				ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
-				if (ret == -EINVAL)
+				mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
+				if (mode == REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID)
 					pr_err("%s: invalid mode %u\n",
 					       np->name, pval);
 				else
-					suspend_state->mode = ret;
+					suspend_state->mode = mode;
 			} else {
 				pr_warn("%s: mapping for mode %d not defined\n",
 					np->name, pval);
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
index a4456db5849d..884c7505ed91 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static inline unsigned int twl4030reg_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
 	case RES_STATE_SLEEP:
 		return REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY;
 	default:
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID;
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
index df176d7c2b87..25602afd4844 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct regmap;
  * These modes can be OR'ed together to make up a mask of valid register modes.
  */
 
+#define REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID			0x0
 #define REGULATOR_MODE_FAST			0x1
 #define REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL			0x2
 #define REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE			0x4
-- 
2.17.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists