[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180420175928.nup3hcqxe2u4ugln@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:59:28 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Decouple dynamic __PHYSICAL_MASK from AMD SME
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:33:39AM +0000, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> AMD SME claims one bit from physical address to indicate whether the
> page is encrypted or not. To achieve that we clear out the bit from
> __PHYSICAL_MASK.
>
> The capability to adjust __PHYSICAL_MASK is required beyond AMD SME.
> For instance for upcoming Intel Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption.
>
> Factor it out into a separate feature with own Kconfig handle.
>
> It also helps with overhead of AMD SME. It saves more than 3k in .text
> on defconfig + AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT:
>
> add/remove: 3/2 grow/shrink: 5/110 up/down: 189/-3753 (-3564)
>
> We would need to return to this once we have infrastructure to patch
> constants in code. That's good candidate for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---
>
> Previously, I've posted the patch with MKTME patchset, but it's useful on
> its own as it reduces text size for kernel with AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT enabled.
>
> Please consider applying.
Any feedback on this?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists