lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:36:38 +0000 From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Howard McLauchlan <hmclauchlan@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tracing: remove igrab() iput() call from uprobes.c > On Apr 20, 2018, at 11:29 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:08:47 -0700 > Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> wrote: > >> For uprobes.c sisde, igrab() is not necessary. So we removed it and > > You don't need to send another patch, but what is the above sentence > suppose to say? > > -- Steve > Sorry for the typo. I meant "For uprobes.c side". Or "it is not necessary to call igrab() in uprobe_register(), as the caller is required to keep the inode reference. Song >> added comments on requirements to callers of uprobe_register().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists