[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1804201635180.25408@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 16:54:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvmalloc: always use vmalloc if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 19-04-18 12:12:38, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> [...]
> > From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] kvmalloc: always use vmalloc if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> >
> > The kvmalloc function tries to use kmalloc and falls back to vmalloc if
> > kmalloc fails.
> >
> > Unfortunatelly, some kernel code has bugs - it uses kvmalloc and then
> > uses DMA-API on the returned memory or frees it with kfree. Such bugs were
> > found in the virtio-net driver, dm-integrity or RHEL7 powerpc-specific
> > code.
> >
> > These bugs are hard to reproduce because vmalloc falls back to kmalloc
> > only if memory is fragmented.
> >
> > In order to detect these bugs reliably I submit this patch that changes
> > kvmalloc to always use vmalloc if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is turned on.
>
> No way. This is just wrong! First of all, you will explode most likely
> on many allocations of small sizes. Second, CONFIG_DEBUG_VM tends to be
> enabled quite often.
You're an evil person who doesn't want to fix bugs.
You refused to fix vmalloc(GFP_NOIO) misbehavior a year ago (did you make
some progress with it since that time?) and you refuse to fix kvmalloc
misuses.
I tried this patch on text-only virtual machine and /proc/vmallocinfo
shows 614kB more memory. I tried it on a desktop machine with the chrome
browser open and /proc/vmallocinfo space is increased by 7MB. So no - this
won't exhaust memory and kill the machine.
Arguing that this increases memory consumption is as bogus as arguing that
CONFIG_LOCKDEP increses memory consumption. No one is forcing you to
enable CONFIG_LOCKDEP and no one is forcing you to enable this kvmalloc
test too.
Mikulas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists